11 Comments
User's avatar
Steve's avatar

I’m curious why you describe the unsecured/fed funds system as unstable. Seems like the secured system is less so, especially since the 2008 crisis was a function of declining collateral values. The Fed described the floor system as easy to manage but it has proven rickety. Sep ‘19, Mar ‘20 point to a fragile system requiring constant, dramatic intervention to maintain. By contrast, the unsecured federal funds system maintained by a corridor worked pretty well. See Bill Nelson’s “I don’t know why she swallowed the fly”

Conks's avatar

hmm, i meant more that it became unstable/unusable and so they switched

i agree that it is STILL unstable

badly worded on my part!

OpLibertas's avatar

It seems like whatever the banking system turns to as a “safe” bet inherently becomes unsafe because anything that a failing system uses will eventually weaken as a result of the failing system itself

Hope that makes sense

JDubzz's avatar

Conks, assuming we get through the debt ceiling without a US default, what's your guess as to what the TGA gets built up to as a steady state, and how long do you think it takes to get there?

Conks's avatar

$500-$600B in a quarter

Steve's avatar

Not criticizing btw. I really appreciate your work.

Aseem Asthana's avatar

So well researched. Excellent work.

InvestSTARS's avatar

Hey, would like to discuss some partnership opportunities with us: InvestSTARS.co.uk

How can we get in contact?

Sandy's avatar

Not an expert but this is not a zero sum game or push this button this happens, more like push this button and 2-3 dynamics change, Soooo....I wander if/when they try to fix that "Lo'r Jaw" they loose the long end?

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 2, 2023
Comment deleted
Conks's avatar

it is mostly foreign entities without access to the RRP, primarily offshore money market funds which hold a lot of dollars, also foreign banks who rely on correspondent banking.